ChessBase Magazine

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
More than 6 years ago, I annotated the game Dominguez - Ivanchuk, Capablanca mem 2016, for CBM 173. The legendary Ukrainian GM convincingly won the whole event and I was especially impressed with the way he handled Black in a Ruy Lopez sideline against the pre-tournament favourite. Therefore I was intrigued by the editor's suggestion in November 2023 to investigate this very line and its most recent developments. I quickly found a suitable candidate for an All-in-One with the Norwegian Defence in the RL - the topical high level encounter Puranik - Carlsen, Doha op 2023 (In case you are wondering, the name of the line doesn't originate from Magnus, who used it for the very first time, but from Svein Johanessen (1937-2007); the Norwegian IM played it regularly in the 50-70s, later it was occasionally tried by GM Simen Adgestein.). However, when checking the contents of CBM 217, I found Marin has made a video, featuring exactly the Puranik - Carlsen game. Not really willing to dispute the well-founded conclusions Mihai and the engine (s) he used came up with, I subsequently had to modify my plans. I chose a different game, also from 2023 and featuring one of Marin's suggested improvements for Black. The following notes look at the whole line from a broader perspective, checking also the pros and cons of the Delayed Steinitz/Delayed Norwegian line - incidentally, 4...d6 5.0-0 b5 6.3 5 was the actual move-order in Ivanchuk's game. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 b5 4...d6 For the second main continuation 5.0-0 5.c4 Bg4 6.Nc3 6.d4 Bxf3 7.Qxf3 exd4 8.0-0 Nf6 9.Na3 Nd7 10.Qd1 g6 11.Nc2 Bg7 12.Bxc6 bxc6 13.Nxd4 c5 14.Nc6 Qf6 15.e5 dxe5 16.Qd5 Qd6 17.Rd1 Nb6 18.Qxd6 cxd6 19.Rxd6 Nxc4 20.Rd5 Rc8 21.Rxc5 Kd7= ½, Shirov,A (2662)-Predojevic,B (2584) Germany 2023 6...Nf6 7.h3 Bxf3 8.Qxf3 Nd7 9.Bxc6 bxc6 10.Qd1 Be7 11.Qa4 c5 12.d3 0-0 13.0-0 Qc8 14.Nd5 Bd8 15.Bd2 Rb8 16.Bc3 c6 17.Ne3 g6 18.Rae1 Bg5 19.Qd1 Nf6 20.Kh2 h5 21.b3 h4 22.Bd2 Qd8 23.g3 Rb7 Sokolov,A (2465)-Vachier Lagrave,M (2742) Chartres 2023 5.Bxc6+ bxc6 6.d4 is move No 3, which gives Black a choice: f6 is played more often 6...exd4 7.Nxd4 c5 is roughly equivalent, Black is OK after 8.Nf3 Nf6 9.Nc3 Be7 10.0-0 0-0 11.b3 Re8 12.Bb2 Bf8 13.Re1 Bg4 14.Qd3 Nd7 15.Ne2 a5 16.Ng3 a4 17.h3 Bxf3 18.Qxf3 Vallejo Pons,F (2667)-Lagno,K (2542) Moscow blitz 2023 Ne5!? 19.Bxe5 Rxe5= 7.Nc3 Ne7 7...g6!? 8.Qe2 Bg7 9.Be3 Ne7 10.0-0-0 h6 11.Nd2 Be6 12.f4 exf4 13.Bxf4 0-0 14.Nf3 Qd7 15.Rhe1 Rfe8 16.h4 Bg4 17.Kb1 Kh7 18.Qf2 Rab8 19.Rd3 Be6 20.Rdd1 Bg8 21.Bc1 a5 22.e5 Nd5 23.Nxd5 Bxd5 24.h5 g5 25.exf6 Bxf6 26.Ne5 dxe5 27.Qxf6 Qe6= ½, Perunovic,M (2603)-Demchenko,A (2629) Sarajevo 2017 8.Be3 Ng6 9.Qd2 9.Qe2 Be6 10.0-0-0 Be7 is similar 9...Be7 10.0-0-0 Be6 11.Kb1 11.h4 h5 12.dxe5 fxe5 13.Ng5 Bxg5 14.Bxg5 Qb8 15.b3?! Qb4 16.f3 a5 17.Na4 c5 18.Kb2 0-0 19.Qxb4 axb4 20.c3 Rfb8 21.cxb4 Rxb4 22.Nc3 c4 23.Nd5 Rb7 24.Ne7+ Nxe7 25.Bxe7 c3+ 26.Kxc3 Rxa2-+ Ivkov,B-Smyslov,V Belgrade 1956 11...Qd7 12.h3 Rb8 13.b3 h5 14.dxe5 fxe5 15.Ng5 Bxg5 16.Bxg5 0-0 17.Qe2 Nf4 18.Bxf4 Rxf4 19.f3 Ra8 20.h4 a5∞ Huschenbeth,N (2598)-Alekseenko,K (2686) Chess.com INT rpd 2023 5.d4 b5 6.Bb3 Nxd4 7.Nxd4 exd4 8.Bd5 Rb8 9.Qxd4 Nf6 9...Ne7!? 10.0-0 Be7 11.Bc6+ Bd7 12.Bxd7+ Qxd7= need not worry Black, he has comfortable equality. 5.c3 However, Black also has the more active f5!? , the so called Siesta line seems to have stood the test of time and onslaught of ever improving engines: The more solid and restrained approach is 5...Bd7 6.d4 g6 Starting with the fianchetto is more flexible, than developing the 8; Black wants to leave both his options open. 7.0-0 Sometimes even keeping the on g8 has a point, e.g. after 7.d5 Nb8!? 7...Nce7 is more usual, but here the idea doesn't work so well: 8.Bxd7+ Qxd7 9.0-0 Bh6 10.Bxh6 Nxh6 11.Ng5!? 8.Bxd7+ Nxd7 9.c4 Black can seriously consider Bh6!?N 7...Bg7 8.Bg5 Nge7 9.Re1 was tested 3x in a recent high calibre blitz match: h6 9...0-0 10.dxe5 Nxe5 11.Nxe5 Bxe5 12.Nd2 Bg7 13.Nf3 Bxa4 14.Qxa4 h6 15.Bh4 Carlsen,M (2839)-Nakamura,H (2780) Chess.com INT blitz 2023 b5 16.Qc2 Re8= 10.Bh4 Qc8 11.dxe5 dxe5 12.Nbd2 0-0 13.Qe2 Bg4 14.h3 Be6 15.Bb3 g5 16.Bg3 Ng6 17.Bxe6 Qxe6 18.Qc4 Rfe8 19.Red1 Bf8 20.Ne1 b5 21.Qxe6 Rxe6 22.Nb3 Rb8 23.f3 Nf4 24.Kf1 a5 25.Bf2 a4= Carlsen,M (2839)-Nakamura,H (2780) Chess.com INT blitz 2023 6.exf5 Bxf5 7.0-0 7.d4 e4 8.d5 exf3 9.Qxf3 9.dxc6 Qe7+ 10.Kf1 fxg2+ 11.Kxg2 0-0-0 9...Bxb1! 9...Qe7+?! 10.Kd1 Be4 11.Qh3 Bxd5 12.Re1 Be4 13.Nd2 Nf6 14.f3 Qd7 15.Nxe4 Qxh3 16.Nxf6+ Kf7 17.gxh3 Kxf6 18.h4 h6 19.Kc2 19.Bb3 Na5 20.Bc2 Nc4 21.h5± 19...d5 20.Bf4 Bd6 21.Bxd6 cxd6 22.Bb3 Rac8 23.Rad1 Gajsin,E (2404)-Yandemirov,V (2494) Voronezh 2004 10.dxc6 b5 11.Bb3 Bg6 12.0-0 Qf6 13.Re1+ Be7 14.Qg4 Qf5 15.Qxf5 Bxf5 16.a4 16.Bxg8 Rxg8 17.Bg5 h6 18.Bxe7 Kf7 = 16...bxa4 17.Bxg8 Rxg8 18.Bg5 h6 19.Rxe7+ Kf8 20.Re3 hxg5 ½, Wiesinger,J (2117)-Cuccumini,V (2056) email 2020 21.Rf3 g6 22.g4 Kg7 23.gxf5 Rgf8 24.f6+ Rxf6 25.Rxf6 Kxf6 26.Rxa4 Rb8 27.Rxa6 Rxb2 28.Ra7 Rb1+ 29.Kg2 Rc1 30.Rxc7 Rxc3= 7...Bd3 8.Re1 Be7 9.Bc2 risks little, but leads to a symmetrical position after 9.Re3 e4 10.Ne1 Bg5 11.Rh3 11.Rg3 Bh4 12.Re3 Bg5= 11...Nf6 12.Nxd3 exd3 13.Rxd3 0-0 14.Rh3 Ne4!? 14...Qe7 15.d4 Ng4 16.Bb3+ Kh8 17.Bxg5 Qxg5 18.Qc2 h6 19.Nd2 Rxf2 20.Ne4 Rxc2 21.Nxg5 Rxb2 22.Nf7+ Kh7 23.Rf1 Re8 24.Be6 Nf6 25.Ng5+ Kh8 26.Rxf6 gxf6 27.Rxh6+ Kg7 28.Rh7+ Kg6 29.Bf7+ Kxg5 30.h4+ Kf4 31.Bxe8± 15.f3 Nc5 16.Bc2 16.Bxc6 bxc6 17.d4 Bxc1 18.Qxc1 Ne6 16...h6 17.d4 Bxc1 18.Qxc1 Ne6 19.Bb3 d5 20.Rh5 Ne7 21.Re5 Nf4 9.Qb3 Rb8! 10.Qd5 Bf5! 11.Bb3 Nf6 12.Qf7+ Kd7 13.d4 Rf8 14.Qxg7 e4 15.d5 Ne5 16.Nxe5+ dxe5 17.d6 cxd6 18.Bg5 Qc7 18...Nh5 19.Qxe7+ Qxe7 20.Bxe7 Kxe7 21.Nd2 Nf4! 22.Nxe4 Nd3 23.Re2 Bxe4 24.Rxe4 Rxf2 25.Rd1 Rf4= 19.Qh6 Ng4 20.Qg7 Nf6 21.Qh6= ½, Guevara I Pijoan,J (2315)-Boulanger,M (2339) email 2020 9...Bxc2 10.Qxc2 Nf6 11.d4 e4 11...0-0? 12.d5! e4 13.Ng5 Ne5 14.Ne6 Qd7 15.Nd2 e3 16.Rxe3 Nxd5 17.Nxf8 Nxe3 18.Qxh7+ Kxf8 19.fxe3 Re8 20.e4 d5 21.Nb3 dxe4 22.Be3 Bf6 23.Rf1 Ng4 24.Bd4 Qc6 25.Bc5+ 1-0, Anand,V (2715)-Jussupow,A (2665) Wijk aan Zee 1994 12.Ng5 d5 13.f3 h6 14.Nh3 14.Ne6 Qd7 15.Nf4 Qf5!? 15...0-0 16.fxe4 dxe4∞ 16.fxe4 dxe4 14...0-0 15.Nd2 exf3 16.Nxf3 Rf7! 16...Qd7 17.Qg6 Qg4 18.Qxg4 Nxg4 19.Nf4 Rfd8 20.Ne6 Rd7 21.Bf4 Rc8 22.Re2 b6 23.Rae1 Nf6 24.Be5 Kf7 25.Nf4 Bd6 26.g3 Leko,P (2630)-Jussupow,A (2665) Vienna 1996 17.Nf2 17.Nf4 Bd6 18.Qg6 18.Ng6? Ne4 19.c4? Nxd4 20.Nxd4 Qf6-+ 18...Ne7= 17...Bd6 18.Bd2 Qf8 This is OK, but 18...Re7!? 19.Rxe7 Qxe7 20.Re1 Qf8= seems simpler 19.Ne5 Bxe5 20.dxe5 Nd7 21.Ng4 Re7 22.Qd3 22.e6 Nf6 23.Nxf6+ Qxf6 24.Qb3 Rxe6 25.Qxd5 Rae8= 22...Kh8 23.Bg5!? hxg5 24.Re3 g6 25.Rf1 Qg8! 26.e6 26.Rh3+ Rh7 27.Rxh7+ Qxh7 28.e6 Nde5 29.Nxe5 Nxe5 30.Qg3 Nc4 31.Qxg5 Nd6! 32.Rf3 Qg7 33.e7 Re8 34.Rh3+ Kg8 35.Qxd5+ Qf7 36.Qe5 Qg7 37.Qe6+ Nf7= 26...Rxe6 27.Rxe6 Qxe6 28.Qh3+ Kg7 29.Qh6+ Kg8 30.Nf6+ Nxf6 31.Qxg6+ Kh8 32.Qh6+= 5...b5!? 6.Bb3 Na5 see the line 6.0-0 below: 5.Bb3 Na5 6.d4 As we'll see from the following note, immediate central aggression limits Black's options and requires accurate reactions - arguably it's the main test of Black's bishop-grabbing concept. 6.Bxf7+?! Kxf7 7.Nxe5+ Ke7 is dubious and was seen mostly in blitz and rapid games. White doesn't have quite sufficient compensation after 8.d4 d6 9.Nd3 Kf7 10.0-0 Bb7 11.Nc3 Nf6 12.e5 dxe5 13.dxe5 13.Nxe5+ Kg8 14.Bg5 Khanin,S (2521)-Nesterov,A (2514) Chess.com INT blitz 2021 h6 15.Bh4 Rh7! 13...Nd5 14.Ne4 Be7 14...Kg8!? 15.Qh5+ Kg8 16.Ndc5 Bc6 17.Qg4 Bxc5 18.Qe6+ Kf8 19.Nxc5 Qe8 20.Qh3 Kg8 21.f4 h5 22.Nd3 Qg6 23.f5 Qg4 24.Qxg4 hxg4 Vachier Lagrave,M (2789)-Vallejo Pons,F (2707) Riadh rpd 2017 Double-edged, but rather harmless is 6.Nxe5 Nxb3 7.axb3 Qg5! 7...Qe7 8.d4 d6 9.Nf3 Qxe4+ 10.Be3 Bb7 11.c4!? Qg4 12.d5 Qxg2 13.Rg1 8.Nf3 Qxg2 9.Rg1 Qh3 10.Nc3 Bb7 11.d3 11.Nd5 Bd6 12.Rxg7 f5 13.d3 0-0-0 11...Ne7 12.Bf4 12.Rg3 Qh5 13.Rg5 Qh3= 12...d6 13.b4 h6 14.Rg3 Qd7 15.Nd4 Janetschek,K-Zwaig,A Nice olm 1974 g6 However, statistically speaking, the main move is 6.0-0 , when after d6 7.d4 Nowadays Black more often than not plays the more active, but also more risky exd4 Another way to fight for advantage is 7...Nxb3 8.axb3 f6 After 9.Nc3 9.c4 b4! and Black is doing OK even in recent games: 10.Be3 10.d5 Ne7 11.Ne1 c5 12.f4 exf4 13.Bxf4 Ng6 14.Nd3 Be7 15.Nd2 0-0 16.Nf3 Re8 17.Qd2 Bf8 18.Rae1 a5 19.h4 Nh8 20.Bg3 Nf7 21.Re2 a4 22.bxa4 Rxa4 A ideal position - White has no concrete active plan and Black's bishops gradually start to tell. 10...Ne7 11.Ne1 Ng6 12.Nd3 exd4 13.Bxd4 c5 14.Be3 Djukic,N (2518)-Kadric,D (2584) Sarajevo 2023 Qd7!? 15.Qh5 Qf7 9...Bb7 10.Qe2!? 10.Nh4 Ne7 11.dxe5 dxe5 12.Qf3 Qd7 13.Rd1 Qe6 14.Be3 After 14.Nd5 the engine recommendation is the sharp 0-0-0!? 15.c4 h5 14...g6 15.Bc5 15.Rd3 Nc6! 15...Rd8 is also playable 16.Rad1 16.Nd5 0-0-0! The 6 is taboo and after 17.c4 Bd6 Black might actually have the upper hand! 16...Bd6 17.Rxd6 cxd6 18.Nd5 Kf7 19.Nc7 Qe7 20.Nxa8 20.Nd5= 20...Rxa8 is OK for Black, the resulting position resembles a Najdorf! 15.Rd2 Nc6!? is similar 15...Kf7! 16.Qe3 Bg7 There have been no subsequent games with this position, here Dominguez instead of the premature swap on e7 could have played something like 17.Nf3 Rhd8 18.b4!? /= 10...Ne7 11.Rd1 Ng6 The more usual 11...Qc8 might still be better, after 12.Be3 Black has b4!?N 13.Na2 a5 12.h4!? 12.dxe5 fxe5 13.Ng5 Qd7 14.Nd5 Be7 15.Nxe7 15.Ne6!? Bd8 16.Nxd8 Rxd8 17.Qf3 Rc8 /= 15...Nxe7 16.Qh5+ g6 17.Qf3 Ng8! 18.c4 h6 19.Nh3 Groszpeter,A (2565)-Nikcevic,N (2485) Cannes 1996 g5 19...0-0-0!?∞ 20.Qh5+ Qf7= 12...Qc8 13.h5 Ne7 14.h6? 14.Be3!?∞ / 14...Qg4! 15.dxe5 fxe5 16.hxg7 Bxg7 17.Bg5 b4 18.Nd5 Nxd5 19.exd5 0-0 20.Be3 Bc8 21.Qc4 Qxc4 22.bxc4 Bg4 23.Re1 a5 was already pleasant for Black and his 8.Nxd4 8.Qxd4 The most played move is Bb7 , but here Black must reckon with the yet untested, but dangerous positional sacrifice 8...Nxb3 9.axb3 Bb7 10.Nc3 Ne7 10...Nf6 11.Re1 Be7 12.e5 11.Bg5 f6 12.Bd2 Nc6 13.Qe3 Be7 14.Nh4 0-0 15.Nd5 Rf7 16.Nf5 Bf8 17.Rfe1 Ne7 18.Qf3 Qc8 19.c4 Rb8 20.Ndxe7+ Bxe7 21.Qg3 Kh8 22.f3 Bf8 23.Ne3 Qe8 24.Qf2 Rd7 25.Red1 Ra8 26.Bc3 Kg8 27.Rd3 Hassim,U (2312)-Anokhin,Y (2410) email 2017 8...Nf6 9.e5 Nxb3 10.axb3 c5 11.Qd3 11.Qe3!?± 11...dxe5 12.Qxd8+ Kxd8 13.Nxe5 13.Nc3! 13...Be6 14.Bf4 Nd5 15.Bg3 Kc8 16.Re1 Kb7 17.Nc3 Nb4 18.Rac1 Rd8 19.Re2 Rg8 20.f3 Kb6 21.f4 Nc6 22.f5 Bxf5 23.Nxf7 Rd7= ½, Markus,N (2092)-Wosch,A (2170) email 2002 9.Bd5!? 9.c4 Nf6 10.Nc3 Be7 11.cxb5 axb5 12.Bc2 retains the light-squared but Black finishes his development and is OK after c5 13.Qd1 b4 14.Nd5 0-0= 9...c6 10.Re1! Ne7 11.b3 The position again resembles the Sicilian with a typical sacrifice on d5, after cxd5 12.exd5 f6 13.Bd2 Kf7 14.Nc3 Bc8 15.a4 White will probably win another pawn and has ample play for the piece. Marin also mentions a similar sacrifice on d5, where Black faces typical problems with his exposed and vulnerable queenside pawns. 8...Bb7 9.Bd2!? Nxb3 9...c5 10.Bd5 Bxd5 11.exd5 cxd4 12.Qe1+ Qe7 13.Bxa5 Qxe1 14.Rxe1+ Ne7 15.c4! and despite simplification Black faces a dreary endgame. 10.Nxb3 Nf6 10...Rb8 11.a4! Nf6 12.axb5 axb5 13.Qe2 11.Na5 Qc8 12.Nc3 12.Re1 Be7 13.e5 dxe5 14.Rxe5 Bd5 15.Bg5 c6 16.Nc3 Be6 17.Qf3 17.Bxf6 Bxf6 18.Rc5 0-0 17...Ng4 18.Rxe6 Qxe6 19.Bxe7 Ne5 20.Qe3 Qxe7 21.Re1 0-0-0 22.Qb6 Nf3+ 23.gxf3 Qxe1+ 24.Kg2 Rd6! and White has only a perpetual. 12...Be7 13.Qf3 0-0 14.Nd5 promises a nagging pull: Nxd5 15.exd5 Bf6 16.c3 Rb8 17.Be3 Re8 18.Rad1 Re5 19.Rd3 Qd7 19...Rf5 20.Qd1 b4 21.c4 Bxb2 22.Rb3 Bc3 23.a3 c5 24.Qd3 h5 25.Rc1 Re5 26.Bf4 Qc7 27.Rbxc3 bxc3 28.Bxe5 dxe5 29.Qxc3± Riccio,E (2488)-Wosch,A (2246) email 2016 20.Ba7 Ra8 21.Nxb7 Rxa7 22.Na5 Ra8 23.Nc6 Rf5 24.Qd1 / Mcdermott,F (2251)-Kuitert,C (2156) email 2018 6...exd4 7.Qxd4 The centralized complicates Black's development by limiting the 8. On the other hand, contrary to the line from the previous note, without d6 it's more difficult for White to advantageously open the position. Less testing is 7.Nxd4 Bb7 , as here 8.0-0?! 8.a4 c5 9.Nf5 g6 10.Nd6+ Bxd6 11.Qxd6 Qe7 12.Bf4 g5!? 13.Qxe7+ Nxe7 14.Bd6 c4 15.Ba2 Bxe4 16.Nc3 Aronian,L (2782)-Sadhwani,R (2609) Kolkata blitz 2021 Bxg2 17.Rg1 Bc6 18.Bb4 Nb7∞ 8...c5! is a rather vague piece sacrifice: For 8...d6?! see the previous note 9.Nf5 c4 10.Bf4 cxb3 11.axb3 Nc6 12.Nc3 g6 12...d6!? 13.Nd6+ Bxd6 14.Bxd6 and only the error Nge7?! gave White a powerful initiative after 14...f6! 15.Nd5 Rc8∞ / 15.Nd5 0-0 16.Bc7 Qc8 17.Nf6+ Kg7 18.Qd6 Ra7 Vachier Lagrave,M (2760)-Firouzja,A (2759) Paris rpd 2021 19.Rfd1!? Ng8 20.Nxd7 Re8 21.Ba5! Nxa5 22.Qd4+± 7...Bb7 The most consistent reaction. Earlier Black used to play either 7...Nxb3 or 7...Ne7 , but the text-move is simply more flexible. The best place for the is undoutedly b7, while the 8 can still be deployed differently, possibly even only after 6. The swap on b3 also won't run away for the time being. 8.Nc3 Just like Puranik, White retains the option to castle queenside. 8.Bg5?! only invites f6 9.Bxg8 9.Bd2 c5 10.Qc3 Kovchan,A (2566)-Souleidis,G (2429) Dresden 2018 Nxb3 11.Qxb3 Bxe4! and White still has to prove he has enough for the central pawn. 9...fxg5! 10.Bd5 c6 11.Bb3 c5 12.Qe5+ Qe7 13.Bd5 Qxe5 14.Nxe5 Bxd5 15.exd5 Bd6 16.Nf3 g4 17.Nfd2 0-0 18.Nc3 Rae8+ 19.Nce4 Nc4 20.0-0 Nxd2 21.Nxd6 Re5 Ulybin,M (2455)-Moiseenko,V (2532) Sochi rpd 2019 After 8.0-0 a move with an independent significance is Ne7!? However, White again has 8...c5 9.Qe5+ Qe7 10.Qc7 Qd8 11.Qxd8+ Rxd8 12.Bd5 8...d6 transposes to the 6.0-0 d6 line above. 9.Bd5 After 9.Nc3 Marin makes a case for the untested Nec6N 9...Nxb3 10.cxb3!? Nc6 11.Qd3 Bc5 12.a3 0-0∞ is similar 10.Qd3 Nxb3 11.axb3 Bc5 with a satisfactory position. 9.Bg5 Fully playable is also d6!? 9...f6 10.Be3 Ng6 10...Nxb3 11.axb3 d5!= 11.c4 Nxb3 12.axb3 c5 13.Qd3 b4 14.Nbd2 Be7 15.Rfe1 Qc7 16.Nf1 0-0 17.Ng3 Rfe8 18.Rad1 Bc6 19.h4 Bf8 20.h5 Ne5 21.Nxe5 Qxe5 22.Qd2 a5 23.Bf4 Qe6 24.f3 Sparenberg,E (2117)-Erwich,F (2358) Vlissingen 2015 10.c3 h6 11.Bh4 Nxb3 12.axb3 Qd7 13.c4 b4 14.Nbd2 Nc6 15.Qe3 g5 16.Bg3 Bg7 16...0-0-0!? 17.c5 dxc5 18.Qxc5 Qe7 18...Bxb2 19.Ra2 Bc3 19.Qc2 0-0∞ Although right now the posiiton is not fully clear, later on the bishops dominated the board. 9...c6 10.Re1!? , now 10.Bb3 Ng6= leads nowhere 10...cxd5 11.exd5 d6 12.b3 is the enterprising piece sacrifice, mentioned already in the note to move 6. 8...Ne7 Marin also prefers this less committal move. The 8 can still have a future on the a3-f8 diagonal. Carlsen's choice was 8...d6 9.Bg5 Magnus played Ne7 9...f6 10.Bxg8 Rxg8 11.Bd2 Nc4 12.0-0-0 g6 13.Nd5 Bg7 14.Bc3 Kf7 15.h4?! 15.Qd3 c6 16.Ne3± 15...c6 16.Ne3 c5 17.Qd3 Nxe3 18.Qxe3 Re8 19.Qf4 Kg8 20.Rxd6? Bh6 21.Qxh6 Qxd6 22.h5 Bxe4 23.hxg6 Bxg6 24.Nh4 Qf8-+ 25.Nxg6 Qxh6+ 26.Rxh6 Kg7! Marin prefers 9...Nxb3 10.axb3 f6 11.Bd2 Ne7 However, all this is 1) hardly forced and 2) still quite dangerous for Black. White can also continue with the more sedate 12.0-0!? After His main line runs 12.0-0-0 Qd7 13.Rhe1 Nc6 14.Qe3 Be7 15.Nd5 0-0 16.Nh4 Rf7 17.Nf5 Bf8 18.Qh3 Kh8 19.Re3 a5 20.Rg3 b4 21.Nh6! Re7! 21...gxh6 22.Nxf6 22.Nxe7 Qxe7 23.Nf5 Qe8 / 12...Nc6 13.Qd3 Qd7 14.Nd5 play develops along similar lines, only White's is in a safer place. 10.Nd5 and now the extremely provocative, but objectively suspect Rg8?! Puranik avoided sacrifices with Mihai once again points out 10...Nxb3 11.axb3 Nc6 12.Qc3 12.Qd3 Be7 12...f6 13.Bf4 13.Bxf6 gxf6 14.Ng5 fxg5 15.Qxh8 Ne5 16.Qxh7 Bxd5 17.exd5 Qe7= 13...Be7 After 14.Nh4 or 14.h4!? the position resembles the 9...b3 line. 11.c4?! 11.0-0 c5 12.Qd2 c4 13.Be3 Nxd5 14.exd5 Be7 15.Rfe1 Kd7 16.Rad1 cxb3 17.axb3 Qc7 18.Qd3 g6 19.Ng5 is another version of the piece sacrifice on d5 we have already mentioned above. Black's remains exposed and he faces a difficult defence. Even more energetic is 11.0-0-0! - let's remember that queenside castling not only safeguards the but at the same time actively develops the 1! I will give Mihai's main line without too many variations, as it is pretty illustrative. The more curious readers should check his video: c5 11...f6 12.Bd2 c5 13.Qe3 c4 14.Nb6 cxb3 15.Bxa5 bxa2 16.Qa3+- or 11...Nxb3+ 12.axb3 f6 13.Bd2 Qd7 14.Ba5 c5 15.Qd3 Nxd5 16.exd5 g6 17.Rhe1+ Kf7 18.Re6 Bh6+ 19.Kb1 Rge8 20.Rde1 doesn't help 12.Nf6+! gxf6 13.Bxf7+ Kxf7 14.Qxf6+ Ke8 15.Rxd6 Qc7 16.Ne5 Rg7 17.Bh6 Ng6 18.Re6+ Re7 19.Qf7+ Kd8 20.Rd1+ Bd5! 20...Kc8 21.Qe8++- 21.Rxe7 Bxh6+ 22.Kb1 Qxe7 23.Qxd5+ Kc7 24.Nxg6 Qe8 25.Qd6+ Kb7 26.Ne7 Nc4 27.Qd5+ Kc7 28.Qxc5+ Kb7 29.Qd5+ Kc7 30.Nf5± Black has done his best to stay afloat, but White still has 4for the a continuing attack and excellent winning chances - around +1 in enginespeak. 11...f6 12.Bd2 c5 13.Qc3 Nxc4 14.Bxc4 bxc4 15.0-0-0 15.Nxe7 Bxe7 16.Qxc4 d5 15...Nxd5 16.exd5 Kf7 17.Qxc4 Qd7 Magnus gradually took over after 18.g4 18.Qf4 g5 19.Qe4 Rg7 20.Bc3 Re8 18.Bc3 g6 19.Qh4 Qf5 20.Rhe1 20.Qxh7+ Bg7 21.h4 Qf4+ 21...Rh8? 22.Ng5+ 22.Kb1 Qf5+ 23.Ka1 Qh5 24.Qxh5 gxh5 20...Bg7 21.Re6 Rae8 22.Rxd6 Re4 23.Qh3!? 23.Qg3 Rge8 23...Qxh3 24.gxh3 Rge8 25.Nd2 Rf4 26.f3 18...Re8 19.Bc3 h5 20.Rhg1 g5 21.gxh5 21.h4!? Qb5! 21...Qf5 22.Rd3 g4 23.Nd2 Bh6 24.Kd1 Bxd2 24...Qxh5 25.Bxd2 Re5 25...Re4!? 26.Qb3 Ba8 26...Bc8!-+ 27.Rgg3 Puranik,A (2618)-Carlsen,M (2839) Doha 2023 Qxf2 9.Bg5 This gives Black a tempo and allows him to resolve his opening problems. The analoguous 9.Bd5?! is dubious here due to c6 10.0-0 cxd5 11.exd5 f6! 12.Re1 Kf7 Black intends b4 or 5 and has good chances to gradually unravel his forces. 9.h4 Nxb3 10.axb3 Nc6 11.Qd5 Nb4! 11...Rb8 12.Be3 Nb4 13.Qe5+ Be7 14.0-0-0 0-0 15.h5 d6 16.Qf4 Qc8 17.Rh3 f5 18.exf5 c5 19.g4 d5 20.Re1 Qd8 21.h6+- Voit,D (2343)-Zherebtsova,A (2225) Satka 2020 12.Qxb7 Rb8 13.Qa7 Ra8= 9.Be3 Nxb3 10.axb3 Nc6 11.Qd2 Bb4 12.0-0 0-0 13.Qd3 Re8 14.Nd5 Bf8 15.Bg5 Qc8 16.c3 h6 17.Bd2 Ne7 18.c4 Nxd5 19.cxd5 c6 20.Rac1 Qb8 21.e5 cxd5 22.Rfe1 d6 23.Bf4 dxe5 24.Nxe5 and now Qd8 would have given Black a healthy extra pawn. White's best choice seems to be 9.0-0 , which transposes into the 8.0-0 line. Above we mentioned Nxb3 and 9...Nec6 as plausible continuations. 9...f6 10.Be3 Ng6N A novelty, but more logical and definitely simpler is 10...Nxb3 Black finally grabs the and remains flexible with the future deployment of his 11.axb3 11.cxb3 d5!? 12.exd5 Nxd5 13.0-0-0 13.Nxd5 Qxd5 Even after 13.0-0!? Black has more than one way to get a good position: c5!? 13...Ne7 14.Qf4 Ng6 15.Qf5 Be7 16.Nd4 Qc8= 14.Qh4 14.Qe4+ Qe7 14...Nxe3 15.Rfe1 Be7 16.Rxe3 0-0 13...Nxc3 14.Qxc3 Bd6 15.Nd4? 15.Bc5 0-0 16.Kb1 at least halves the although Black is doing fine after e.g., Be4+ 17.Ka1 Qd7 15...Qd7 16.Qd3 0-0 17.Rhg1 f5 18.f3 f4 19.Bf2 Rae8 Nagy,R (2215)-Hidegh Gobolyos,G Hungary 1994 11...Nc6 Here ≤11...d5 already isn't too effective after 12.exd5 Nxd5 13.0-0-0 Nxc3 14.Qxc3 Bd6 15.Bc5 12.Qd2 12.Qd3 Nb4! 13.Qd2 d5 12...Bb4 13.0-0 0-0= is roughly equal. 11.Qd3 11.0-0-0! is more dangerous, as c5?! 12.Qd2 c4? runs into 13.Bb6!+- 11...Bb4 12.0-0 12.0-0-0 still deserved attention, although Black is OK after Nxb3+ 13.axb3 Bxc3 14.Qxc3 d6= 12...Bxc3 12...Nxb3!? and c3= is the more accurate move-order. 13.Qxc3 Nxb3 14.Qxb3! This is the difference, White avoids doubled pawns and at least for the time being prevents castling. Bxe4? Striving to create an imbalance, but this is playing with fire. 14...Qe7 15.Nd2 15.Rfe1 Qf7 15...Qf7= is rather boring, but safe. 15.Rfe1 Bxf3 15...d5? 16.Bc5+- and the 8 won't get to safety in time. 16.Bd4+?! Missing his chance. After 16.Bc5+ Ne5 17.gxf3 g5 17...d6 18.f4 dxc5 19.fxe5 18.Rxe5+ fxe5 19.Re1 d6 19...Qf6 20.Qd5 20.Rxe5+! Kd7 20...Kf8 21.Qe6 Kg7 22.Rf5+- 21.Qe6+ Kc6 22.Qd5+ Kd7 23.Bxd6 cxd6 24.Qb7+ Qc7 25.Re7+ Kxe7 26.Qxc7+ Ke6 27.Qc6± the material is about equal, but White with his active and safer is the only one, who can play for a win. 16...Ne7 16...Kf8 17.Qxf3± 17.gxf3 17.Qxf3 allows 0-0 17...Kf8 17...d6 18.Re6 c5 19.Rae1 cxd4 20.Rxe7+ Qxe7 21.Rxe7+ Kxe7= is, contrary to the line in the note to move 16, already fully playable for Black. 18.Re2 18.a4!? and 18.c4!? are more lively attempts to open up the position before Black activates his 8. 18...d6 19.Rae1 Ng6 20.Qe3? The should have stayed on the vital a2-g8 diagonal. 20.Re6 still makes it difficult for Black to untangle and keeps the balance, for example Qd7 21.Qd5 Rd8 22.Qf5 Kg8 23.Kh1 23.Re8+ Rxe8 24.Qxd7 Rxe1+ 25.Kg2 Nf4+ 26.Kg3 Ne2+= 23...Qf7 23...Nf8 24.Rxf6 24.Bxf6 gxf6 25.Rg1+ Ng6 26.Rxg6+ hxg6 27.Qxg6+ Qg7 is only a perpetual after 28.Re8+ Rxe8 29.Qxe8+= 24...Qxf5 25.Rxf5 Ng6 26.Bc3 Rf8 27.Rg5!? Rxf3 28.Re8+ Rf8 29.Re7 Rf7 30.Re8+= 24.Bc3 20...Qd7 21.Qe4 d5 22.Qe6 22.Qg4 Qxg4+ 23.fxg4 Kf7 22...Qxe6 23.Rxe6 Kf7 24.Rc6 Rhc8 25.c3 25.Ree6 Ne7 26.Rxa6 c6 27.Rxa8 Rxa8 28.Rd6 Rxa2 29.Bc5 Kg6-+ or 29...Ng6 30.Rxc6 Rxb2-+ also doesn't help. 25...Ne7 26.Rce6 Re8 White can't increase his pressure and once Black trades the the rest will be a matter of technique - extra and better pawn-structure as well. 27.Bc5 Nf5 28.Rxe8 Rxe8 29.Rxe8 Kxe8-+ 30.Kg2 Kd7 31.f4 Kc6 32.b4 d4 33.cxd4 Kd5 34.Kf3 Nxd4+ 35.Kg4 f5+ 36.Kg3 Ne6 37.Be7 Ke4 38.f3+ Kd3 The 2 is doomed and White has no counterplay whatosoever. Conclusion: While Carlsen's 8...d6 and especially 10...8?! (it is too hazardous and I don't really believe all this was home preparation) are over the top, in general the Norwegian Ruy Lopez seems to be a viable sideline, with Black holding the (sometimes rather uneasy) balance in most branches. However, you need to be well prepared and tactically fully alert! As even our stem game shows, White's lead in development often promises him combinational opportunities. 0–1
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here